lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3431541.1740763345@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:22:25 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
    Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
    Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
    netfs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] netfs: Fix collection of results during pause when collection offloaded

    
A netfs read request can run in one of two modes: for synchronous reads
writes, the app thread does the collection of results and for asynchronous
reads, this is offloaded to a worker thread.  This is controlled by the
NETFS_RREQ_OFFLOAD_COLLECTION flag.

Now, if a subrequest incurs an error, the NETFS_RREQ_PAUSE flag is set to
stop the issuing loop temporarily from issuing more subrequests until a
retry is successful or the request is abandoned.

When the issuing loop sees NETFS_RREQ_PAUSE, it jumps to
netfs_wait_for_pause() which will wait for the PAUSE flag to be cleared -
and whilst it is waiting, it will call out to the collector as more results
acrue...  But this is the wrong thing to do if OFFLOAD_COLLECTION is set as
we can then end up with both the app thread and the work item collecting
results simultaneously.

This manifests itself occasionally when running the generic/323 xfstest
against multichannel cifs as an oops that's a bit random but frequently
involving io_submit() (the test does lots of simultaneous async DIO reads).

Fix this by only doing the collection in netfs_wait_for_pause() if the
NETFS_RREQ_OFFLOAD_COLLECTION is not set.

Fixes: e2d46f2ec332 ("netfs: Change the read result collector to only use one work item")
Reported-by: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
cc: linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org
cc: netfs@...ts.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
---
 fs/netfs/read_collect.c |   18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
index 636cc5a98ef5..23c75755ad4e 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
@@ -682,14 +682,16 @@ void netfs_wait_for_pause(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
 		trace_netfs_rreq(rreq, netfs_rreq_trace_wait_queue);
 		prepare_to_wait(&rreq->waitq, &myself, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 
-		subreq = list_first_entry_or_null(&stream->subrequests,
-						  struct netfs_io_subrequest, rreq_link);
-		if (subreq &&
-		    (!test_bit(NETFS_SREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &subreq->flags) ||
-		     test_bit(NETFS_SREQ_MADE_PROGRESS, &subreq->flags))) {
-			__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-			netfs_read_collection(rreq);
-			continue;
+		if (!test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_OFFLOAD_COLLECTION, &rreq->flags)) {
+			subreq = list_first_entry_or_null(&stream->subrequests,
+							  struct netfs_io_subrequest, rreq_link);
+			if (subreq &&
+			    (!test_bit(NETFS_SREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &subreq->flags) ||
+			     test_bit(NETFS_SREQ_MADE_PROGRESS, &subreq->flags))) {
+				__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+				netfs_read_collection(rreq);
+				continue;
+			}
 		}
 
 		if (!test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &rreq->flags) ||


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ