[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8IFr6LxK8m0kaDF@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 20:51:27 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
Dumitru Ceclan <mitrutzceclan@...il.com>,
Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>,
Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@...il.com>,
Alisa-Dariana Roman <alisadariana@...il.com>,
Ramona Alexandra Nechita <ramona.nechita@...log.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] property: Add
device_get_child_node_count_named()
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:07:24AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:33 PM Matti Vaittinen
> <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:
...
> > +unsigned int device_get_child_node_count_named(const struct device *dev,
> > + const char *name)
>
> I think this should be implemented as
> fwnode_get_child_node_count_named() with the device variant being just
> a wrapper.
Good catch! That's also added to our misunderstanding with Matti who didn't get
the role of dev_of_node() vs. dev_fwnode() in the first place.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists