[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adc90638-79a7-4015-accc-0932611cc697@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:45:57 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Olivier Dion <odion@...icios.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] SKSM: Synchronous Kernel Samepage Merging
On 28.02.25 22:38, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> On 2025-02-28 10:10, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> [...]
>> For example, QEMU will mark all guest memory is mergeable using MADV, to
>> limit the deduplicaton to guest RAM only.
>>
>
> On a related note, I think the madvise(2) documentation is inaccurate.
>
> It states:
>
> MADV_MERGEABLE (since Linux 2.6.32)
> Enable Kernel Samepage Merging (KSM) for the pages in the range
> specified by addr and length. [...]
>
> AFAIU, based on code review of ksm_madvise(), this is not strictly true.
>
> The KSM implementation enables KSM for pages in the entire vma containing the range.
> So if it so happens that two mmap areas with identical protection flags are merged,
> both will be considered mergeable by KSM as soon as at least one page from any of
> those areas is made mergeable.
I *think* it does what is documented. In madvise_vma_behavior(),
ksm_madvise() will update "new_flags".
Then we call madvise_update_vma() to split the VMA if required and set
new_flags only on the split VMA. The handling is similar to other MADV
operations that end up modifying vm_flags.
If I am missing something and this is indeed broken, we should
definitely write a selftest for it and fix it.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists