linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add TI TPS65214 & TPS65215 Regulator Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9051f3af-525b-4b97-be9a-b8f3e2af659b@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:17:16 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, aaro.koskinen@....fi, andreas@...nade.info,
	khilman@...libre.com, rogerq@...nel.org, tony@...mide.com,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	m-leonard@...com, praneeth@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add TI TPS65214 & TPS65215 Regulator Support

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:30:43AM -0600, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote:
> On 2/26/2025 4:40 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > These all appear to be in the MFD tree without a tag to pull from or
> > anything so I can't apply any of this stuff until after the merge
> > window.  I'm not clear why they weren't sent as part of the MFD series?
> > You should probably resend copying Lee.

> I wasn't sure if the MFD + entire regulator patches could be sent in the same series, so this is good to know!

In general if there's a build dependency it's OK to send things
together, if the patches are just for the same board or something but
don't actually interact at all then that's the time to split them up.

> I will resend a v5 Regulator series with Lee cc'd asking if he can take the series if you give the patches an ACK when ready.

OK.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)