[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XSoANcWJEB13xmP0HjMS9dSF-LFsXG-1DS-UPbbeOxig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:29:49 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Use bridge_state crtc pointer
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:44 AM Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The TI sn65dsi86 driver follows the drm_encoder->crtc pointer that is
> deprecated and shouldn't be used by atomic drivers.
>
> This was due to the fact that we did't have any other alternative to
> retrieve the CRTC pointer. Fortunately, the crtc pointer is now provided
> in the bridge state, so we can move to atomic callbacks and drop that
> deprecated pointer usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Booted this up on my coachz with ti-sn65dsi86 and the display came up:
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
I haven't followed all of the refactorings, but assuming all the
previous patches are good w/ folks then this one seems fine to me:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists