lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06ae9c0e-ba5c-4f25-a9b9-a34f3290f3fe@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:28:20 +0530
From: "Sapkal, Swapnil" <swapnil.sapkal@....com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, Manfred Spraul
	<manfred@...orfullife.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	WangYuli <wangyuli@...ontech.com>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
	"Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal" <gautham.shenoy@....com>, <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pipe_read: don't wake up the writer if the pipe is still
 full

Hi Oleg,

On 2/28/2025 2:42 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Sapkal, first of all, thanks again!
> 
> On 02/27, Sapkal, Swapnil wrote:
>>
>>> 1. with 1 fd instead of 20:
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/hackbench -g 16 -f 1 --threads --pipe -l 100000 -s 100
>>
>> With this I was not able to reproduce the issue. I tried almost 5000
>> iterations.
> 
> OK,
> 
>>> 2. with a size which divides 4096 evenly (e.g., 128):
> ...
>> When I retain the number of
>> groups to 16 and change the message size to 128, it took me around 150
>> iterations to reproduce this issue (with 100 bytes it was 20 iterations).
>> The exact command was
>>
>> /usr/bin/hackbench -g 16 -f 20 --threads --pipe -l 100000 -s 128
> 
> Ah, good. This is good ;)
> 
>> I will try to sprinkle some trace_printk's in the code where the state of
>> the pipe changes. I will report here if I find something.
> 
> Great! but...
> 
> Sapkal, I was going to finish (and test! ;) the patch below tomorrow, after
> you test the previous debugging patch I sent in this thread. But since you
> are going to change the kernel...
> 
> For the moment, please forget about that (as Mateusz pointed buggy) patch.
> Could you apply the patch below and reproduce the problem ?
> 

Yes, I was able to reproduce the problem with the below patch.

> If yes, please do prctl(666) after the hang and send us the output from
> dmesg, between "DUMP START" and "DUMP END". You can just do
> 
> 	$ perl -e 'syscall 157,666'
> 
> to call prctl(666) and trigger the dump.
> 

I found a case in the dump where the pipe is empty still both reader and 
writer are waiting on it.

[ 1397.829761] E=1 F=0; W=1719147 R=1719147
[ 1397.837843] RD=1 WR=1

Full dump is attached below.

> Oleg.
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
> index b0641f75b1ba..566c75a0ff81 100644
> --- a/fs/pipe.c
> +++ b/fs/pipe.c
> @@ -376,6 +376,8 @@ anon_pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>   	}
>   	if (pipe_empty(pipe->head, pipe->tail))
>   		wake_next_reader = false;
> +	if (ret > 0)
> +		pipe->r_cnt++;
>   	mutex_unlock(&pipe->mutex);
>   
>   	if (wake_writer)
> @@ -565,6 +567,8 @@ anon_pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>   out:
>   	if (pipe_full(pipe->head, pipe->tail, pipe->max_usage))
>   		wake_next_writer = false;
> +	if (ret > 0)
> +		pipe->w_cnt++;
>   	mutex_unlock(&pipe->mutex);
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -695,6 +699,42 @@ pipe_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
>   	return mask;
>   }
>   
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(PI_MUTEX);
> +static LIST_HEAD(PI_LIST);
> +
> +void pi_dump(void);
> +void pi_dump(void)
> +{
> +	struct pipe_inode_info *pipe;
> +
> +	pr_crit("---------- DUMP START ----------\n");
> +	mutex_lock(&PI_MUTEX);
> +	list_for_each_entry(pipe, &PI_LIST, pi_list) {
> +		unsigned head, tail;
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&pipe->mutex);
> +		head = pipe->head;
> +		tail = pipe->tail;
> +		pr_crit("E=%d F=%d; W=%d R=%d\n",
> +			pipe_empty(head, tail), pipe_full(head, tail, pipe->max_usage),
> +			pipe->w_cnt, pipe->r_cnt);
> +
> +// INCOMPLETE
> +pr_crit("RD=%d WR=%d\n", waitqueue_active(&pipe->rd_wait), waitqueue_active(&pipe->wr_wait));
> +
> +		for (; tail < head; tail++) {
> +			struct pipe_buffer *buf = pipe_buf(pipe, tail);
> +			WARN_ON(buf->ops != &anon_pipe_buf_ops);
> +			pr_crit("buf: o=%d l=%d\n", buf->offset, buf->len);
> +		}
> +		pr_crit("\n");
> +
> +		mutex_unlock(&pipe->mutex);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&PI_MUTEX);
> +	pr_crit("---------- DUMP END ------------\n");
> +}
> +
>   static void put_pipe_info(struct inode *inode, struct pipe_inode_info *pipe)
>   {
>   	int kill = 0;
> @@ -706,8 +746,14 @@ static void put_pipe_info(struct inode *inode, struct pipe_inode_info *pipe)
>   	}
>   	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>   
> -	if (kill)
> +	if (kill) {
> +		if (!list_empty(&pipe->pi_list)) {
> +			mutex_lock(&PI_MUTEX);
> +			list_del_init(&pipe->pi_list);
> +			mutex_unlock(&PI_MUTEX);
> +		}
>   		free_pipe_info(pipe);
> +	}
>   }
>   
>   static int
> @@ -790,6 +836,13 @@ struct pipe_inode_info *alloc_pipe_info(void)
>   	if (pipe == NULL)
>   		goto out_free_uid;
>   
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pipe->pi_list);
> +	if (!strcmp(current->comm, "hackbench")) {
> +		mutex_lock(&PI_MUTEX);
> +		list_add_tail(&pipe->pi_list, &PI_LIST);
> +		mutex_unlock(&PI_MUTEX);
> +	}
> +
>   	if (pipe_bufs * PAGE_SIZE > max_size && !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
>   		pipe_bufs = max_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>   
> diff --git a/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h b/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h
> index 8ff23bf5a819..48d9bf5171dc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ struct pipe_inode_info {
>   #ifdef CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
>   	struct watch_queue *watch_queue;
>   #endif
> +
> +	struct list_head pi_list;
> +	unsigned w_cnt, r_cnt;
>   };
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> index 4efca8a97d62..a85e34861b2e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -2483,6 +2483,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
>   
>   	error = 0;
>   	switch (option) {
> +	case 666: {
> +		extern void pi_dump(void);
> +		pi_dump();
> +		break;
> +	}
>   	case PR_SET_PDEATHSIG:
>   		if (!valid_signal(arg2)) {
>   			error = -EINVAL;
> 
--
Thanks and Regards,
Swapnil
View attachment "dump" of type "text/plain" (22644 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ