[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEEQ3wmAxF=PkRt_pKFZE5-r9w1SMY7YQtco2mCyE+vus7vufg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:41:34 +0800
From: yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc: apatel@...tanamicro.com, atishp@...osinc.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, samuel.holland@...ive.com,
jassisinghbrar@...il.com, takakura@...inux.co.jp,
valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com, ruanjinjie@...wei.com,
charlie@...osinc.com, conor.dooley@...rochip.com, haibo1.xu@...el.com,
andybnac@...il.com, ke.zhao@...ngroup.cn, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] riscv: print hartid on bringup
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:58 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Yunhui,
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 1:54 PM yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Gentle ping. Any comments on this patch?
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 7:06 PM Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Firmware randomly releases cores, so CPU numbers don't linearly map
> > > to hartids. When the system has an exception, we care more about hartids.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 4 ++++
> > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c
> > > index d58b5e751286..e650dec44817 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c
> > > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__cpuid_to_hartid_map);
> > > void __init smp_setup_processor_id(void)
> > > {
> > > cpuid_to_hartid_map(0) = boot_cpu_hartid;
> > > +
> > > + pr_info("Booting Linux on hartid %lu\n", boot_cpu_hartid);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(int, ipi_dummy_dev);
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> > > index e36d20205bd7..beba0efb00b9 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> > > @@ -231,6 +231,10 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_callin(void)
> > > riscv_ipi_enable();
> > >
> > > numa_add_cpu(curr_cpuid);
> > > +
> > > + pr_info("CPU%u: Booted secondary hartid %lu\n", curr_cpuid,
> > > + cpuid_to_hartid_map(curr_cpuid));
> > > +
> > > set_cpu_online(curr_cpuid, true);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > --
> > > 2.39.2
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yunhui
>
> IIRC that's a debug feature when you can't reach userspace and use
> cpuinfo, so what about using pr_debug() instead?
Using pr_debug needs enabling #define DEBUG in
arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c and adding loglevel=8 to cmdline, not
convenient. Can't always cat /proc/cpuinfo before running in user
mode.
It's true that pr_info prints a large amount of information in the
startup logs, especially when there are many CPU cores.
Do you have a better solution?
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
Thanks,
Yunhui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists