[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ce5065e-8b9b-46a8-b7c1-5f9b8f118b06@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:35:46 +0530
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>, Madadi Vineeth Reddy
<vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman
<mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Josh Don
<joshdon@...gle.com>, Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: "open list:SCHEDULER" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix SCHED_IDLE behavior on wakeup preemption
Hello Abel,
On 2/27/2025 2:28 PM, Abel Wu wrote:
> The commit 6bc912b71b6f ("sched: SCHED_OTHER vs SCHED_IDLE isolation")
> defines the behavior of SCHED_IDLE as following:
>
> - no SCHED_IDLE buddies
> - never let SCHED_IDLE preempt on wakeup
> - always preempt SCHED_IDLE on wakeup
> - limit SLEEPER fairness for SCHED_IDLE
>
> and the middle two of them are broken now.
Feel free to include:
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
>
> v2:
> - Collect Reviewed-by tags from Vincent, Josh and Madadi, thanks!
> - Rebased to up-to-date tip. (Madadi)
> - Folded some discussion with Vincent into commit log.
>
> Abel Wu (2):
> sched/fair: Do not let idle entities preempt others
> sched/fair: Fix premature check of WAKEUP_PREEMPTION
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists