[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdas4TsMQx2Cvu_JR3kTStqWaOt1N+Cmq7nFesMzpGnZ+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:44:33 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
spacemit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqdomain: support three-cell scheme interrupts
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 9:42 PM Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org> wrote:
> > This function is meant for "twocell". There is also another function
> > irq_domain_translate_onecell(). Why don't you just create
> > irq_domain_translate_threecell" instead?
> >
> good question!
>
> it's too many changes for adding "threecell" which I thought not worth
> the effort, or maybe we can rename the function to *twothreecell()?
>
> I'm not sure which way to go is the best, ideas from maintainer are
> welcome
Yeah just rename it twothreecell, that's fine, we will understand it :)
Thanks for driving this change, much appreciated!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists