[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8GDqxTNN0rLBbrX@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:36:43 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/speculation: Simplify and make CALL_NOSPEC
consistent
* Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> CALL_NOSPEC macro is used to generate Spectre-v2 mitigation friendly
> indirect branches. At compile time the macro defaults to indirect branch,
> and at runtime those can be patched to thunk based mitigations.
>
> This approach is opposite of what is done for the rest of the kernel, where
> the compile time default is to replace indirect calls with retpoline thunk
> calls.
>
> Make CALL_NOSPEC consistent with the rest of the kernel, default to
> retpoline thunk at compile time when CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE is
> enabled.
>
> Also add the missing __CS_PREFIX to the CALL_NOSPEC macro to make it
> compatible with -mindirect-branch-cs-prefix.
The __CS_PREFIX change should probably be a separate patch.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists