linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v18 2/3] mm: memory-failure: move return value documentation to function declaration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z8GeBJ9tTayTm9s9@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:29:08 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: yazen.ghannam@....com, mark.rutland@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
	robin.murphy@....com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, bp@...en8.de,
	rafael@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, tanxiaofei@...wei.com,
	mawupeng1@...wei.com, tony.luck@...el.com, linmiaohe@...wei.com,
	naoya.horiguchi@....com, james.morse@....com,
	tongtiangen@...wei.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, will@...nel.org,
	jarkko@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, justin.he@....com,
	ardb@...nel.org, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, ashish.kalra@....com,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	robert.moore@...el.com, lvying6@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
	zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
	guohanjun@...wei.com, sudeep.holla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 2/3] mm: memory-failure: move return value
 documentation to function declaration

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 09:46:30AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
[...]
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 04:17:34PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> > > Part of return value comments for memory_failure() were originally
> > > documented at the call site. Move those comments to the function
> > > declaration to improve code readability and to provide developers with
[...]
> By the way, could arm maintainers help to ack patch 1 and 3 if there
> is no objection?

James Morse is listed as reviewer of the ACPI APEI code but he's busy
with resctrl/MPAM. Adding Lorenzo, Sudeep and Hanjun as arm64 ACPI
maintainers, hopefully they can help. Here's the full series:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250107081735.16159-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com/

-- 
Catalin