linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] hyperv: Introduce hv_recommend_using

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c8b92d3-d3fc-42a6-9493-2e18508c5890@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:21:43 -0800
From: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
 x86@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
 mhklinux@...look.com, decui@...rosoft.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
 will@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
 joro@...tes.org, robin.murphy@....com, arnd@...db.de,
 jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com, muminulrussell@...il.com,
 skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com, mrathor@...ux.microsoft.com,
 ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com, apais@...ux.microsoft.com,
 Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com, stanislav.kinsburskiy@...il.com,
 gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, vkuznets@...hat.com, prapal@...ux.microsoft.com,
 muislam@...rosoft.com, anrayabh@...ux.microsoft.com, rafael@...nel.org,
 lenb@...nel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] hyperv: Introduce hv_recommend_using_aeoi()

On 2/27/2025 10:04 AM, Roman Kisel wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/26/2025 3:07 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
>> Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root
>> partition code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
> 
> I think adding "No functional changes" would bring some benefit:
> that's an additional invariant to check against when reviewing.
> 
Thanks, I can add it for next version :)