[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250301003009.GP5011@ziepe.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 20:30:09 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, x86@...nel.org,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Enlightened vTPM support for SVSM on SEV-SNP
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:07:14PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I put RFC back in because we haven't yet decided if this is the best
> approach to support SVSM vTPM, but I really like to receive feedbacks
> especially from the maintainer/reviewers of the TPM subsystem, to see if
> this approach is acceptable.
I didn't look in high detail, but the overall shape is what I was
thinking about in our previous conversations. Very little TPM code is
under arch/, we have a nice simplifying helper in the core code, and
you have a tidy platform device to tie it all together.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists