[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250301105352.2951af4c@fedora.home>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 10:53:52 +0100
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Heiner Kallweit
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, Parthiban Veerasooran
<parthiban.veerasooran@...rochip.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean
<vladimir.oltean@....com>, Köry Maincent
<kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Romain Gantois
<romain.gantois@...tlin.com>, Piergiorgio Beruto
<piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: ethtool: netlink: Pass a context for
default ethnl notifications
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:24:40 -0800
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 19:24:52 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > The only relevant user for now is PLCA, and it very likely that we never
> > ended-up in a situation where the follow-up notif wasn't targeting the
> > correct PHY as :
>
> PLCA uses the ethnl_default_* handlers but it seems to operate on PHYs
> now. How does the dump work? Shoehorning the PHY support into
> the ethnl_default_* handlers is starting to look pretty messy.
I agree, that's the less ugly quick solution I could think of :(
So maybe we need some generic PHY dump support for all PHY commands ?
I should probably re-send patch 1 only to fix the crash, and rework the
dump/notify for PHY commands separately if this is OK for you ?
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists