lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4670e5f8-2a92-46bd-8faa-dd3774517f3e@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 12:11:54 +0100
From: "Sven Peter" <sven@...npeter.dev>
To: "Nick Chan" <towinchenmi@...il.com>, "Janne Grunau" <j@...nau.net>,
 "Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>, "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
 "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] arm64: dts: apple: Add CPU cache information for Apple A7-A11,
 T2 SoCs

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, at 13:21, Nick Chan wrote:
> Add CPU cache information for Apple A7-A11, T2 SoCs. On Apple
> A10 (T8010), A10X (T8011), T2 (T8012), only the caches in one of the
> CPU clusters can be used due to the "Apple Fusion Architecture"
> big.LITTLE switcher. The values for the P-cluster is used in this
> case.

So this means that the cache information will be "wrong" when the CPU
is in the lower power states and only correct for the higher ones?
I'm not familiar with how these values are used; are you and do you
know if this will have any weird or unexpected effects?
Would it be better to use the cache size for the lower rather than
the higher states or does this not matter much?



Best,


Sven

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ