linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 2/9] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub, add}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202503020203.USVBw4Bn-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 03:00:19 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"(maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Juergen Christ <jchrist@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>,
	"(moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/9] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub,
 add}_return()

Hi Lyude,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on 2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lyude-Paul/preempt-Introduce-HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS/20250228-062508
base:   2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227221924.265259-3-lyude%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH v9 2/9] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub, add}_return()
config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503020203.USVBw4Bn-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503020203.USVBw4Bn-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503020203.USVBw4Bn-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:85,
                    from include/linux/alloc_tag.h:11,
                    from include/linux/percpu.h:5,
                    from include/linux/context_tracking_state.h:5,
                    from include/linux/hardirq.h:5,
                    from include/linux/kvm_host.h:7,
                    from arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.c:11:
   arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h: In function '__preempt_count_add_return':
>> arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h:109:38: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
     109 |                         return val + __atomic_add_const(val, &get_lowcore()->preempt_count);
         |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:102: arch/s390/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
   make[3]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[2]: *** [Makefile:1264: prepare0] Error 2
   make[2]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.


vim +109 arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h

   100	
   101	static __always_inline int __preempt_count_add_return(int val)
   102	{
   103		/*
   104		 * With some obscure config options and CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
   105		 * enabled, gcc 12 fails to handle __builtin_constant_p().
   106		 */
   107		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES)) {
   108			if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && (val >= -128) && (val <= 127)) {
 > 109				return val + __atomic_add_const(val, &get_lowcore()->preempt_count);
   110			}
   111		}
   112		return val + __atomic_add(val, &get_lowcore()->preempt_count);
   113	}
   114	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki