linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu/arm: Add BBM Level 2 smmu feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b46dc626-edc9-4d20-99d2-6cd08a01346c@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:32:21 -0800
From: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
To: Mikołaj Lenczewski <miko.lenczewski@....com>,
 ryan.roberts@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
 will@...nel.org, joro@...tes.org, jean-philippe@...aro.org,
 mark.rutland@....com, joey.gouly@....com, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
 james.morse@....com, broonie@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jgg@...pe.ca, nicolinc@...dia.com,
 mshavit@...gle.com, jsnitsel@...hat.com, smostafa@...gle.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu/arm: Add BBM Level 2 smmu feature




On 2/28/25 10:24 AM, Mikołaj Lenczewski wrote:
> For supporting BBM Level 2 for userspace mappings, we want to ensure
> that the smmu also supports its own version of BBM Level 2. Luckily, the
> smmu spec (IHI 0070G 3.21.1.3) is stricter than the aarch64 spec (DDI
> 0487K.a D8.16.2), so already guarantees that no aborts are raised when
> BBM level 2 is claimed.
>
> Add the feature and testing for it under arm_smmu_sva_supported().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikołaj Lenczewski <miko.lenczewski@....com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c                  | 7 +++----
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c | 3 +++
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c     | 3 +++
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h     | 4 ++++
>   4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 63f6d356dc77..1022c63f81b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -2223,8 +2223,6 @@ static bool has_bbml2_noabort(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps, int sco
>   			if (!cpu_has_bbml2_noabort(__cpu_read_midr(cpu)))
>   				return false;
>   		}
> -
> -		return true;
>   	} else if (scope & SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU) {
>   		/* We are a hot-plugged CPU, so only need to check our MIDR.
>   		 * If we have the correct MIDR, but the kernel booted on an
> @@ -2232,10 +2230,11 @@ static bool has_bbml2_noabort(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps, int sco
>   		 * we have an incorrect MIDR, but the kernel booted on a
>   		 * sufficient CPU, we will not bring up this CPU.
>   		 */
> -		return cpu_has_bbml2_noabort(read_cpuid_id());
> +		if (!cpu_has_bbml2_noabort(read_cpuid_id()))
> +			return false;
>   	}
>   
> -	return false;
> +	return has_cpuid_feature(caps, scope);

Do we really need this? IIRC, it means the MIDR has to be in the allow 
list *AND* MMFR2 register has to be set too. AmpereOne doesn't have 
MMFR2 register set.

Thanks,
Yang

>   }
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PAN
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> index 9ba596430e7c..6ba182572788 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> @@ -222,6 +222,9 @@ bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>   		feat_mask |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_VAX;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (system_supports_bbml2_noabort())
> +		feat_mask |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BBML2;
> +
>   	if ((smmu->features & feat_mask) != feat_mask)
>   		return false;
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 358072b4e293..dcee0bdec924 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -4406,6 +4406,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>   	if (FIELD_GET(IDR3_RIL, reg))
>   		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RANGE_INV;
>   
> +	if (FIELD_GET(IDR3_BBML, reg) == IDR3_BBML2)
> +		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BBML2;
> +
>   	/* IDR5 */
>   	reg = readl_relaxed(smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_IDR5);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index bd9d7c85576a..85eaf3ab88c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_device;
>   #define ARM_SMMU_IDR3			0xc
>   #define IDR3_FWB			(1 << 8)
>   #define IDR3_RIL			(1 << 10)
> +#define IDR3_BBML			GENMASK(12, 11)
> +#define IDR3_BBML1			(1 << 11)
> +#define IDR3_BBML2			(2 << 11)
>   
>   #define ARM_SMMU_IDR5			0x14
>   #define IDR5_STALL_MAX			GENMASK(31, 16)
> @@ -754,6 +757,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
>   #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HA		(1 << 21)
>   #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HD		(1 << 22)
>   #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_S2FWB		(1 << 23)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BBML2		(1 << 24)
>   	u32				features;
>   
>   #define ARM_SMMU_OPT_SKIP_PREFETCH	(1 << 0)