[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8bnX8zcY3yIxh9n@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:43:27 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>, Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add ACPI HID for DWAPB I2C controller
on Sophgo SG2044
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:02:11PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> Add ACPI ID for DWAPB I2C controller on Sophgo SG2044 so
> the SoC can enumerated the device via ACPI.
Same as per UART:
---8<---
This is fake ACPI ID. Please work with a vendor to issue the proper one.
Vendor ACPI ID registry has no records on Sophgo:
https://uefi.org/ACPI_ID_List?acpi_search=SophGo
NAK.
---8<---
But, it might be that is already in the process of getting proper ACPI vendor
ID, please provide an evidence in such a case.
Otherwise drag the representative of the vendor to this email thread to answer
the question why the heck they abuse ACPI specification.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists