[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_4E7B1F143E8051530C21FCADF4E014DCBB06@qq.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:54:01 +0800
From: Aiden Ma <jiaheng.ma@...mail.com>
To: corbet@....net
Cc: brauner@...nel.org,
sforshee@...nel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Aiden Ma <jiaheng.ma@...mail.com>
Subject: [RESEND] doc: correcting two prefix errors in idmappings.rst
Add the 'k' prefix to id 21000. And id `u1000` in the third
idmapping should be mapped to `k31000`, not `u31000`.
Signed-off-by: Aiden Ma <jiaheng.ma@...mail.com>
---
Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst
index 90b24b6..58e46f9 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ what id ``k11000`` corresponds to in the second or third idmapping. The
straightforward algorithm to use is to apply the inverse of the first idmapping,
mapping ``k11000`` up to ``u1000``. Afterwards, we can map ``u1000`` down using
either the second idmapping mapping or third idmapping mapping. The second
-idmapping would map ``u1000`` down to ``21000``. The third idmapping would map
-``u1000`` down to ``u31000``.
+idmapping would map ``u1000`` down to ``k21000``. The third idmapping would map
+``u1000`` down to ``k31000``.
If we were given the same task for the following three idmappings::
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists