[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8b3n85dpkz_-2ci@google.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 12:52:47 +0000
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
nadav.amit@...il.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jannh@...gle.com,
mhklinux@...look.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
Manali.Shukla@....com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 11/13] x86/mm: do targeted broadcast flushing from
tlbbatch code
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:47:42PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > static void broadcast_tlb_flush(struct flush_tlb_info *info)
> > {
> > bool pmd = info->stride_shift == PMD_SHIFT;
> > @@ -790,6 +821,8 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING))
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
> >
> > + tlbsync();
>
> This one is in dire need of comments.
I have been advocating to move this to a place where it's clearer. I
also think it needs comments:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+i-1C31TrceZiizC_tng_cc-zcvKsfXLAZD_XDftXnp9B2Tdw@mail.gmail.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists