[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250303140229.642959-1-mordan@ispras.ru>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 17:02:29 +0300
From: Vitalii Mordan <mordan@...ras.ru>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Vitalii Mordan <mordan@...ras.ru>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
Vadim Mutilin <mutilin@...ras.ru>,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: at91sam9: fix call balance of rtc->sclk handling routines
If rtc->sclk was enabled in at91_rtc_probe(), it must be disabled in
all error paths to ensure proper cleanup. However, if
devm_rtc_register_device() returns an error in at91_rtc_probe(), the
rtc->sclk clock will not be disabled.
Use the devm_clk_get_enabled() helper function to ensure proper call
balance for rtc->sclk.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Klever.
Fixes: a975f47f6e9a ("rtc: at91sam9: use clk API instead of relying on AT91_SLOW_CLOCK")
Signed-off-by: Vitalii Mordan <mordan@...ras.ru>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c | 28 +++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
index 38991cca5930..f4b7cf37397f 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
@@ -375,21 +375,16 @@ static int at91_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;
}
- rtc->sclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(rtc->sclk))
+ rtc->sclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(rtc->sclk)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not get and enable slow clock\n");
return PTR_ERR(rtc->sclk);
-
- ret = clk_prepare_enable(rtc->sclk);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not enable slow clock\n");
- return ret;
}
sclk_rate = clk_get_rate(rtc->sclk);
if (!sclk_rate || sclk_rate > AT91_RTT_RTPRES) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid slow clock rate\n");
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto err_clk;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
mr = rtt_readl(rtc, MR);
@@ -405,10 +400,8 @@ static int at91_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
rtt_writel(rtc, MR, mr);
rtc->rtcdev = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
- if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtcdev)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(rtc->rtcdev);
- goto err_clk;
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtcdev))
+ return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtcdev);
rtc->rtcdev->ops = &at91_rtc_ops;
rtc->rtcdev->range_max = U32_MAX;
@@ -419,7 +412,7 @@ static int at91_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_name(&rtc->rtcdev->dev), rtc);
if (ret) {
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "can't share IRQ %d?\n", rtc->irq);
- goto err_clk;
+ return ret;
}
/* NOTE: sam9260 rev A silicon has a ROM bug which resets the
@@ -433,11 +426,6 @@ static int at91_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_name(&rtc->rtcdev->dev));
return devm_rtc_register_device(rtc->rtcdev);
-
-err_clk:
- clk_disable_unprepare(rtc->sclk);
-
- return ret;
}
/*
@@ -450,8 +438,6 @@ static void at91_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* disable all interrupts */
rtt_writel(rtc, MR, mr & ~(AT91_RTT_ALMIEN | AT91_RTT_RTTINCIEN));
-
- clk_disable_unprepare(rtc->sclk);
}
static void at91_rtc_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists