lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McQMvbLc0OGa7JU_F7Y6Qw6-pUGK9EC25jfVAZNcTkzfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:52:07 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpiolib: finish conversion to devm_*_action*() APIs

On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 11:49 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 06:20:25PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > GPIOLIB has some open coded stuff that can be folded to the devm_*_action*()
> > calls. This mini-series is for that. The necessary prerequisites are here
> > as well, namely:
> > 1) moving the respective APIs to the devres.h;
> > 2) adding a simple helper that GPIOLIB will rely on;
> > 3) finishing the GPIOLIB conversion to the device managed action APIs.
> >
> > The series is based on another series that's available via immutable tag
> > devres-iio-input-pinctrl-v6.15 [1]. The idea is to route this via GPIOLIB
> > tree (or Intel GPIO for the starter) with an immutable tag for the device
> > core and others if needed. Please, review and acknowledge.
>
> Bart, I know it's still 2 days left till the two-week ping time, but since we
> are at rc-5 and this may affect other subsystems I gently ask for your
> Ack/Review and I push it to my branch for GPIO (as it has dependencies which
> are already in my and a few other trees).
>

I thought this needs an Ack from Greg or Rafael?

Bart


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ