[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNOR=EaPPhnkj+WwV8mDYNuM7fY2r_xdjORv2MGGxxH_0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:05:34 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure
for Clang's capability analysis
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 16:29, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 10:21:01AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
>
> > +# define __asserts_cap(var) __attribute__((assert_capability(var)))
> > +# define __asserts_shared_cap(var) __attribute__((assert_shared_capability(var)))
>
> > + static __always_inline void __assert_cap(const struct name *var) \
> > + __attribute__((overloadable)) __asserts_cap(var) { } \
> > + static __always_inline void __assert_shared_cap(const struct name *var) \
> > + __attribute__((overloadable)) __asserts_shared_cap(var) { } \
>
> Since this does not in fact check -- that's __must_hold(), I would
> suggest renaming these like s/assert/assume/.
Yeah, that's better.
FTR - the "asserts_capability" attribute was originally meant to be
used on runtime functions that check that a lock is held at runtime;
what Clang does underneath is simply adding the given capability/lock
to the held lockset, so no real checking is enforced. In this series
it's used for a lot more than just our lockdep_assert*() helpers, so
the "assert" naming is indeed confusing.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists