linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] at24: Drop of_match_ptr() and ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <174100005548.29353.2871325520350905330.b4-ty@linaro.org>
Date: Mon,  3 Mar 2025 12:07:39 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] at24: Drop of_match_ptr() and ACPI_PTR() protections

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>


On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:08:38 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> These result in a very small reduction in driver size, but at the cost
> of more complex build and slightly harder to read code. In the case of
> of_match_ptr() it also prevents use of PRP0001 ACPI based identification.
> In this particular case we have a valid ACPI/PNP ID that should be used
> in preference to PRP0001 but doesn't mean we should prevent that route.
> 
> With this done, drop unneeded of*.h inclusions and __maybe_unused markers.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] at24: Drop of_match_ptr() and ACPI_PTR() protections
      commit: 51e36ca2251c5a47d8f7069d60fd07153cff3f36

Best regards,
-- 
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>