lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8367749d-8dd7-40f5-881e-8f45e432a91d@gaisler.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:49:23 +0100
From: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts
 <ryan.roberts@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
 Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
 "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
 xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm: Fix lazy mmu docs and usage

On 2025-03-03 11:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 03.03.25 11:22, Ryan Roberts wrote:[snip]
>>
>> I didn't actually cc stable on these, I'm wondering if I should do that? Perhaps
>> for all patches except the pagemap change?
> 
> That would make sense to me. CC stable likely doesn't hurt here. (although I wonder if anybody cares about stable on sparc :))

Yes, stable is important for sparc just as well as for other architectures.

Cheers,
Andreas


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ