[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250304165808.t46fh6fwpardheup@thinkpad>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 22:28:08 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, jim2101024@...il.com,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] PCI: brcmstb: Use same constant table for config
space access
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:37:14AM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:08 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:39:34PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > > The constants EXT_CFG_DATA and EXT_CFG_INDEX vary by SOC. One of the
> > > map_bus methods used these constants, the other used different constants.
> > > Fortunately there was no problem because the SoCs that used the latter
> > > map_bus method all had the same register constants.
> > >
> > > Remove the redundant constants and adjust the code to use them. In
> > > addition, update EXT_CFG_DATA to use the 4k-page based config space access
> > > system, which is what the second map_bus method was already using.
> > >
> >
> > What is the effect of this change? Why is it required? Sounds like it got
> > sneaked in.
>
> Hello,
> There is no functional difference with this commit -- the code will
> behave the same. A previous commit set up the "EXT_CFG_DATA" and
> "EXT_CFG_INDEX" constants in the offset table but one of the map_bus()
> methods did not use them, instead it relied on old generic #define
> constants. This commit uses them and gets rid of the old #defines.
>
My comment was about the change that modified the offset of EXT_CFG_DATA. This
was not justified properly.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists