linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] cgroup/cpuset-v1: Add deprecation warnings to sched_load_balance and memory_pressure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <n2ygi7m53y5y4dx5tjxhqgzqtgs5sisdi27sk7x2xjngpxenod@7behfsvlzhxi>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:10:56 +0100
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, 
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] cgroup/cpuset-v1: Add deprecation warnings to
 sched_load_balance and memory_pressure_enabled

On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 06:52:41AM -1000, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:19:00AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> ...
> > I do have some concern with the use of pr_warn*() because some users may
> > attempt to use the panic_on_warn command line option.
> 
> Yeah, let's print these as info.

The intention is _not_ to cause panic by any of this this.
Note the difference between WARN() and pr_warn() (only the former
panics).
Warn level has precedent in mm/memcontrol-v1.c already.

Michal

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)