[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250303091658.GG5880@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 10:16:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, lucas.demarchi@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] perf: Make perf_pmu_unregister() usable
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 08:55:06AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> >> Lucas convinced me that perf_pmu_unregister() is a trainwreck; after
> >> considering a few options I was like, how hard could it be..
> >>
> >> So find here a few patches that clean things up in preparation and then a final
> >> patch that makes unregistering a PMU work by introducing a new event state
> >> (REVOKED) and ensuring that any event in such a state will never get to using
> >> it's PMU methods ever again.
> >
> > So it looks like this series first got lost in the usual end-of-year
> > fog of holidays, then it has become somewhat bitrotten due to other
> > perf changes interacting and creating conflicts. I cannot find these
> > patches in queue.git anymore, other than the somewhat stale 4+ months
> > old perf/pmu-unregister branch from October 2024.
>
> Peter posted V2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205102120.531585416@infradead.org
>
> Same was pushed in Peter's queue repo (2025-02-03):
> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=perf/pmu-unregister
Right, I need to get back to this.. I have a bunch of changes from v2
already accumulated, but haven't gotten around to looking at Ravi's
latest feedback :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists