[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8WQEpv7BNtDDoH3@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:18:42 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Add lockdep assertion for pageblock type
change
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 01:28:04PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 01:31:30AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> The patch is missing a dummy in_mem_hotplug() in the
> !CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG section of <linux/memory_hotplug.h>.
+1, I just stumbled over and this is not fixed in today's Linux Next. I'm
wondering how this was missed during merge into Linux Next. Stephen?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists