[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8c-vvnMpPjYRvOn@grain>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:56:14 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 10/17] posix-timers: Make
signal_struct::next_posix_timer_id an atomic_t
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:24:28PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Welcome. Some quick validation with CRIU would be appreciated.
Just tested in criu: works without problem, both modes -- with new
prctl and without it. Note that I only have ran separate posix-timers
test case, probably virtuozzo team might do more deep tesing.
---
root@fc:/home/cyrill/criu# test/zdtm.py run -t zdtm/static/posix_timers
userns is supported
The kernel is tainted: '512'
=== Run 1/1 ================ zdtm/static/posix_timers
====================== Run zdtm/static/posix_timers in h =======================
Start test
./posix_timers --pidfile=posix_timers.pid --outfile=posix_timers.out
Run criu dump
Run criu restore
Send the 15 signal to 56
Wait for zdtm/static/posix_timers(56) to die for 0.100000
Removing dump/zdtm/static/posix_timers/56
====================== Test zdtm/static/posix_timers PASS ======================
Powered by blists - more mailing lists