[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250304183506.498724-4-mjguzik@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:35:05 +0100
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: brauner@...nel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: jack@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] fs: use fput_close() in filp_close()
When tracing a kernel build over refcounts seen this is a wash:
@[kprobe:filp_close]:
[0] 32195 |@@@@@@@@@@ |
[1] 164567 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@|
I verified vast majority of the skew comes from do_close_on_exec() which
could be changed to use a different variant instead.
Even without changing that, the 19.5% of calls which got here still can
save the extra atomic. Calls here are borderline non-existent compared
to fput (over 3.2 mln!), so they should not negatively affect
scalability.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
---
fs/open.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
index fc1c6118eb30..ffb7e2e5e1ef 100644
--- a/fs/open.c
+++ b/fs/open.c
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ int filp_close(struct file *filp, fl_owner_t id)
int retval;
retval = filp_flush(filp, id);
- fput(filp);
+ fput_close(filp);
return retval;
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists