[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250304195731.GA1960804@yaz-khff2.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 14:57:31 -0500
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] acpi/ghes, cxl/pci: Process CXL CPER Protocol
Errors
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:11:56PM +0000, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
[...]
> +static void cxl_cper_handle_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data *data)
> +{
> + unsigned int devfn = PCI_DEVFN(data->prot_err.agent_addr.device,
> + data->prot_err.agent_addr.function);
> + struct pci_dev *pdev __free(pci_dev_put) =
> + pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(data->prot_err.agent_addr.segment,
> + data->prot_err.agent_addr.bus,
> + devfn);
> +
> + guard(device)(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!pdev)
> + return;
> +
If 'pdev == NULL', then there would be a NULL pointer dereference in the
guard() statement, IIUC.
So I think the guard() statement should go after the NULL pointer check.
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists