[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8aOrCmmfm4rn0k3@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 07:25:00 +0200
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: lee@...nel.org, giometti@...eenne.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
raymond.tan@...el.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: intel_ehl_pse_gpio: Introduce Intel Elkhart
Lake PSE GPIO and TIO
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:20:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:47:29PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:22:41PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:14:35PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:45:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:39:16PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:24:43AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:17:41AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > > > > > +INTEL GPIO MFD DRIVER
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This also needs to be more precise and follow the name. We have more Intel GPIO
> > > > > > > drivers, and MFD doesn't ring any bell about the platform or so. Are you going
> > > > > > > to support all of them (existing and comining)?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not that it is planned as of now but I wouldn't mind :)
> > > > >
> > > > > It sounds like solving the problem that even might never appear :-)
> > > >
> > > > Right, somehow that sounds familiar :D
> > >
> > > So, can we rename the MAINTAINERS record as the result of our discussion?
> >
> > Yep, but perhaps wait a few days for review comments.
>
> Sure.
Or can we just add it under INTEL GPIO DRIVERS? With that I think it'll
be in much better hands.
Raag
Powered by blists - more mailing lists