[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ecf15da0-49ff-4cc3-9e4e-5c47f79acc06@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 15:42:10 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Zenghui Yu
<yuzenghui@...wei.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, Alper Gun
<alpergun@...gle.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 26/45] arm64: Don't expose stolen time for realm guests
On 2/14/25 2:14 AM, Steven Price wrote:
> It doesn't make much sense as a realm guest wouldn't want to trust the
> host. It will also need some extra work to ensure that KVM will only
> attempt to write into a shared memory region. So for now just disable
> it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
With Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst updated:
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index a6718dec00c9..79d541c95bfb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,10 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> r = system_supports_mte();
> break;
> case KVM_CAP_STEAL_TIME:
> - r = kvm_arm_pvtime_supported();
> + if (kvm_is_realm(kvm))
> + r = 0;
> + else
> + r = kvm_arm_pvtime_supported();
> break;
> case KVM_CAP_ARM_EL1_32BIT:
> r = cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists