[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZJnzd6uu9qO5VRLps17-2+ownFQ7CgHCko0vUdjnhTuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 08:57:09 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] gpio: gpio-rcar: Drop direct use of valid_mask
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 1:36 PM Matti Vaittinen
<mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:
> The valid_mask member of the struct gpio_chip is unconditionally written
> by the GPIO core at driver registration. It should not be directly
> populated by the drivers. Hiding the valid_mask in struct gpio_device
> makes it clear it is not meant to be directly populated by drivers. This
> means drivers should not access it directly from the struct gpio_chip.
>
> The gpio-rcar checks the valid mask in set/get_multiple() operations.
> This is no longer needed [1]. Drop these checks.
>
> Additionally, the valid_mask is needed for enabling the GPIO inputs at
> probe time. Use the new valid_mask -getter function instead of accessing
> it directly from the struct gpio_chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists