[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8a9Uro1rrRgIBai@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:44:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
willy@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, lucas.demarchi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/24] perf: Simplify perf_mmap() control flow
* Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> >>> -
> >>> /* We need the rb to map pages. */
> >>
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> This comment should also go up. Keeping it here is misleading.
> >
> > Yeah, I did that in the conflict resolution (which conflicted in this
> > very area), so the end result in tip:perf/core (or tip:master) should
> > be fine as-is, correct?
>
> Yes, tip:perf/core looks good.
Great, thank you for checking!
I also picked up:
bfd33e88addd perf/core: Fix perf_mmap() failure path
and have added your Reviewed-by tags to the series.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists