linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: riscv: selftests: Allow number of interrupts to be configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250304-5a85b3a246f14f60f61a45e0@orel>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:58:15 +0100
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, 
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, 
	kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: riscv: selftests: Allow number of interrupts to
 be configurable

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:27:47PM -0800, Atish Kumar Patra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:16 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:25:06PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
...
> I will change the default value to 0 to avoid ambiguity for now.
> Please let me know if you strongly think we should support -n 0.
> We can always support it. I just don't see the point of specifying the
> test with options to disable it anymore.
>

I don't mind not supporting '-n 0'.

Thanks,
drew