[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bjuh6r9q.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 11:09:53 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
aisheng.dong@....com, peng.fan@....com, frank.li@....com,
shengjiu.wang@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: imx-irqsteer: irq_count can larger than registered
irq
On Tue, Mar 04 2025 at 17:45, Jacky Bai wrote:
> From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Please use the proper subsystem prefix as documented:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#patch-submission-notes
Also 'irq_count can larger than registered irq' is not a sentence and
tells absolutely nothing what this patch is about.
> The irqsteer IP itself can support up to 5 channels and each
> channel can support max 960 IRQs per. The actual number of
Can you please write out words, i.e. interrupts, hardware etc.. This is
a changelog and not twatter.
Aside of that: 'per.' does not make any sense. 'per' wants to be
followed by a noun: '...per $WHAT.'
> channels and IRQ per channel implemented in HW is SoC related.
> For previous i.MX SoCs, normally only one channel and max 512
> IRQ is implemented, But for i.MX94, the irqsteer HW is implemented
> for 960 IRQs, even it only has 384 IRQs connected.
>
> That means on i.MX94, the 'irq_number' is 6 but the 'irq_count' is
What means irq_number and irq_count here?
> 15, so we need to increase the CHAN_MAX_OUTPUT_INT to 0xF(960 / 64)
What kind of math is 0xF(960 / 64) ? And what has this to do with
irq_number=6 ad irq_count=15?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists