[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67c484d7-6929-4a65-b89c-f3fb85682028@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 13:52:46 +0000
From: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org, scclevenger@...amperecomputing.com,
yeoreum.yun@....com, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: Add a KUnit test for
coresight_find_default_sink()
On 05/03/2025 11:42 am, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 05:11:31PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
>>
>> Add a test to confirm that default sink selection skips over an ETF
>> and returns an ETR even if it's further away.
>>
>> This also makes it easier to add new unit tests in the future.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig | 9 ++
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 1 +
>> .../coresight/coresight-kunit-tests.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-kunit-tests.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
>> index 06f0a7594169..056d04bc540a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
>> @@ -247,4 +247,13 @@ config CORESIGHT_DUMMY
>>
>> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be
>> called coresight-dummy.
>> +
>> +config CORESIGHT_KUNIT_TESTS
>> + tristate "Enable Coresight unit tests"
>> + depends on KUNIT
>> + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
>> + help
>> + Enable Coresight unit tests. Only useful for development and not
>> + intended for production.
>> +
>> endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
>> index 4ba478211b31..c170a41b3056 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
>> @@ -51,3 +51,4 @@ coresight-cti-y := coresight-cti-core.o coresight-cti-platform.o \
>> coresight-cti-sysfs.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ULTRASOC_SMB) += ultrasoc-smb.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_DUMMY) += coresight-dummy.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_KUNIT_TESTS) += coresight-kunit-tests.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>> index ea38ecf26fcb..ce63b68d5503 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>> @@ -869,6 +869,7 @@ coresight_find_default_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>> }
>> return csdev->def_sink;
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_find_default_sink);
>>
>> static int coresight_remove_sink_ref(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> {
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-kunit-tests.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-kunit-tests.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..d022bacc8357
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-kunit-tests.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +
>> +#include <kunit/test.h>
>> +#include <kunit/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/coresight.h>
>> +
>> +#include "coresight-priv.h"
>> +
>> +static struct coresight_device *coresight_test_device(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct coresight_device *csdev = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1,
>> + sizeof(struct coresight_device),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + csdev->pdata = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1,
>> + sizeof(struct coresight_platform_data),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + return csdev;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void coresight_free_test_device(struct device *dev,
>> + struct coresight_device *csdev)
>> +{
>> + devm_kfree(dev, csdev->pdata->out_conns);
>
> It will lead memory leaking if we don't release connections pointed by
> 'out_conns' pointer array. Something like:
>
> for (i = 0; i < csdev->pdata->nr_outconns; i++)
> devm_kfree(dev, csdev->pdata->out_conns[i]);
> devm_kfree(dev, csdev->pdata->out_conns);
>
> Otherwise, it looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
Ah yeah, I'll just free the whole device instead of the individual
kfrees then and let devm handle it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists