[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250305140305.GA51446@pauld.westford.csb>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 09:03:05 -0500
From: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] arm64: enable PREEMPT_LAZY
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 11:49:24AM +0100 Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> This is a resubmission of Mark's patch [1]. I didn't end up changing anything
> other than fluffing up the changelog.
>
> I ran this under an arm64 VM, added some trace_printk's and checked that
> sched_switch's between runnable hackbench threads would occurr in the right
> conditions:
> o with TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY set
> o at the tick
> o at do_notify_resume()
> o with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/Z2B5y3HiLuRHPfdv@J2N7QTR9R3.cambridge.arm.com/
>
Thanks! I was looking for this the other day :)
Cheers,
Phil
> Cheers,
> Valentin
>
> Mark Rutland (1):
> arm64: enable PREEMPT_LAZY
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 16 +++++++++-------
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists