[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250305152055.GB28112@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:20:55 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v1 0/3] kernel/events/uprobes:
uprobe_write_opcode() rewrite
On 03/04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> Currently, uprobe_write_opcode() implements COW-breaking manually, which is
> really far from ideal.
To say at least ;)
David, thanks for doing this. I'll try to read 3/3 tomorrow, but I don't
think I can really help. Let me repeat, this code was written many years
ago, I forgot everything, and today my understanding of mm/ is very poor.
But I'll try anyway.
> Are there any uprobe tests / benchmarks that are worth running?
All I know about uprobe tests is that bpf people run a lot of tests which
use uprobes.
Andrii, Jiri, what you advise?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists