[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+Qsu-6Z72uXYKwc62idq2K169S1t0nUrrgNOyezgfYsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:02:15 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Add compatible
for BCM59054
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:52 AM Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 4.03.2025 15:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:20:33AM +0100, Artur Weber wrote:
> >> The BCM59054 MFD is fairly similar to the BCM59056, and will use
> >> the same driver. Add compatible and specify the allowed regulator
> >> nodes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
> >> ...
> > And drop the allOf below.
> >
> >>
> >> required:
> >> - compatible
> >> @@ -30,6 +31,27 @@ required:
> >>
> >> additionalProperties: false
> >>
> >> +allOf:
> >> + - if:
> >> + properties:
> >> + compatible:
> >> + contains:
> >> + const: brcm,bcm59054
> >> + then:
> >> + properties:
> >> + regulators:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/regulator/brcm,bcm59054.yaml#
> >> +
> >> + - if:
> >> + properties:
> >> + compatible:
> >> + contains:
> >> + const: brcm,bcm59056
> >> + then:
> >> + properties:
> >> + regulators:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/regulator/brcm,bcm59056.yaml#
> >> +
> >> examples:
> >> - |
> >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>
> "Drop the allOf" as in, drop just the "allOf" line or the entire block
> with "if" statements? If it's the latter - wouldn't that break the
> bindings for the "regulators" subnode?
Uh, I misread this thinking the regulators node had a compatible... Never mind.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists