[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250305172707.3418080-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 18:27:01 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] initramfs_test: mark testcases as __refdata
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
The testcase calls an __init function, so it must have a corresponding
annotation:
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: initramfs_test_cases+0x0 (section: .data) -> initramfs_test_extract (section: .init.text)
As with other kunit tests, using __refdata suppresses the warning without
annotating the structure itself as __initdata.
Fixes: b6736cfccb58 ("initramfs_test: kunit tests for initramfs unpacking")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
init/initramfs_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/init/initramfs_test.c b/init/initramfs_test.c
index 6231fe012583..3539891ae081 100644
--- a/init/initramfs_test.c
+++ b/init/initramfs_test.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void __init initramfs_test_many(struct kunit *test)
* The kunit_case/_suite struct cannot be marked as __initdata as this will be
* used in debugfs to retrieve results after test has run.
*/
-static struct kunit_case initramfs_test_cases[] = {
+static struct kunit_case initramfs_test_cases[] __refdata = {
KUNIT_CASE(initramfs_test_extract),
KUNIT_CASE(initramfs_test_fname_overrun),
KUNIT_CASE(initramfs_test_data),
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists