lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250305200403.2822855-1-ziy@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed,  5 Mar 2025 15:04:03 -0500
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
	Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] mm/migrate: fix shmem xarray update during migration

A shmem folio can be either in page cache or in swap cache, but not at the
same time. Namely, once it is in swap cache, folio->mapping should be NULL,
and the folio is no longer in a shmem mapping.

In __folio_migrate_mapping(), to determine the number of xarray entries
to update, folio_test_swapbacked() is used, but that conflates shmem in
page cache case and shmem in swap cache case. It leads to xarray
multi-index entry corruption, since it turns a sibling entry to a
normal entry during xas_store() (see [1] for a userspace reproduction).
Fix it by only using folio_test_swapcache() to determine whether xarray
is storing swap cache entries or not to choose the right number of xarray
entries to update.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z8idPCkaJW1IChjT@casper.infradead.org/

Note:
In __split_huge_page(), folio_test_anon() && folio_test_swapcache() is used
to get swap_cache address space, but that ignores the shmem folio in swap
cache case. It could lead to NULL pointer dereferencing when a
in-swap-cache shmem folio is split at __xa_store(), since
!folio_test_anon() is true and folio->mapping is NULL. But fortunately,
its caller split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() bails out early with EBUSY
when folio->mapping is NULL. So no need to take care of it here.

Fixes: fc346d0a70a1 ("mm: migrate high-order folios in swap cache correctly")
Reported-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/28546fb4-5210-bf75-16d6-43e1f8646080@huawei.com/
Suggested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
 mm/migrate.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index fb4afd31baf0..c0adea67cd62 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -518,15 +518,13 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
 	if (folio_test_anon(folio) && folio_test_large(folio))
 		mod_mthp_stat(folio_order(folio), MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON, 1);
 	folio_ref_add(newfolio, nr); /* add cache reference */
-	if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
+	if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
 		__folio_set_swapbacked(newfolio);
-		if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
-			folio_set_swapcache(newfolio);
-			newfolio->private = folio_get_private(folio);
-		}
+	if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
+		folio_set_swapcache(newfolio);
+		newfolio->private = folio_get_private(folio);
 		entries = nr;
 	} else {
-		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapcache(folio), folio);
 		entries = 1;
 	}
 
-- 
2.47.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ