[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250305222052.GAZ8jORCVmKQhEkrw6@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 23:20:52 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: coco: mark cc_mask as __maybe_unused
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> just because of some stupid gcc extra warning switch?
This warning has been kicked out into W1 once already for too many false
positives:
c9c6837d3931 ("kbuild: move -Wunused-const-variable to W=1 warning level")
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists