[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9mT3z5Sg0+SBxVmZnmhAE1Y3U9WSfE_x22QfpqKWjEacw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 18:58:23 -0500
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Boris-Chengbiao Zhou <bobo1239@....de>, Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chayim Refael Friedman <chayimfr@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer.py: add missing macros deps
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 6:14 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:03 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The macros crate has depended on std and proc_macro since its
> > introduction in commit 1fbde52bde73 ("rust: add `macros` crate"). These
> > dependencies were omitted from commit 8c4555ccc55c ("scripts: add
> > `generate_rust_analyzer.py`") resulting in missing go-to-definition and
> > autocomplete, and false-positive warnings emitted from rust-analyzer
> > such as:
> >
> > [{
> > "resource": "/Users/tamird/src/linux/rust/macros/module.rs",
> > "owner": "_generated_diagnostic_collection_name_#1",
> > "code": {
> > "value": "non_snake_case",
> > "target": {
> > "$mid": 1,
> > "path": "/rustc/",
> > "scheme": "https",
> > "authority": "doc.rust-lang.org",
> > "query": "search=non_snake_case"
> > }
> > },
> > "severity": 4,
> > "message": "Variable `None` should have snake_case name, e.g. `none`",
> > "source": "rust-analyzer",
> > "startLineNumber": 123,
> > "startColumn": 17,
> > "endLineNumber": 123,
> > "endColumn": 21
> > }]
> >
> > Add the missing dependencies to improve the developer experience.
> >
> > Fixes: 8c4555ccc55c ("scripts: add `generate_rust_analyzer.py`")
> > Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev>
> > Suggested-by: Chayim Refael Friedman <chayimfr@...il.com>
>
> If this is a fix, then it should use Reported-by -- or the suggestion
> was about the implementation?
The most correct thing here would be Diagnosed-by 😅
> Anyway, I can fix it on my side, but I am also supposed to add a link
> to the report/suggestion -- do you have one?
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/17759#issuecomment-2646328275
> Thanks!
>
> (Tested-by's welcome, by the way!)
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
Thanks!
Tamir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists