[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250305104925.189198-1-vschneid@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:49:24 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] arm64: enable PREEMPT_LAZY
Hey folks,
This is a resubmission of Mark's patch [1]. I didn't end up changing anything
other than fluffing up the changelog.
I ran this under an arm64 VM, added some trace_printk's and checked that
sched_switch's between runnable hackbench threads would occurr in the right
conditions:
o with TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY set
o at the tick
o at do_notify_resume()
o with TIF_NEED_RESCHED set
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/Z2B5y3HiLuRHPfdv@J2N7QTR9R3.cambridge.arm.com/
Cheers,
Valentin
Mark Rutland (1):
arm64: enable PREEMPT_LAZY
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 16 +++++++++-------
arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists