[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNMYoRTj3F1L9UCp2gHVbVZw0ieNnk0xPZ8Q--BhFCy7Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 01:03:51 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 00:52, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
>
> On 3/4/25 1:21 AM, Marco Elver wrote:
> > +#include <linux/build_bug.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Test that helper macros work as expected.
> > + */
> > +static void __used test_common_helpers(void)
> > +{
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(capability_unsafe(3) != 3); /* plain expression */
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(capability_unsafe((void)2; 3;) != 3); /* does not swallow semi-colon */
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(capability_unsafe((void)2, 3) != 3); /* does not swallow commas */
> > + capability_unsafe(do { } while (0)); /* works with void statements */
> > +}
>
> Is it guaranteed that <linux/build_bug.h> includes the header file that
> defines capability_unsafe() or should that header file perhaps be
> included explicitly?
It doesn't come in via build_bug.h, but via:
scripts/Makefile.lib -> "-include
$(srctree)/include/linux/compiler_types.h" (all TUs) ->
compiler-capability-analysis.h.
The things pulled in via compiler_types.h are treated a bit like
builtins available everywhere implicitly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists