lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250305105657.z637peejnkai7fgn@bogus>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 10:56:57 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	Adam Young <admiyo@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] mailbox: pcc: Move pcc_mbox_ioremap() before
 pcc_mbox_request_channel()

On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:48:13PM +0800, lihuisong (C) wrote:
> 
> 在 2025/3/3 18:51, Sudeep Holla 写道:
> > In order to add support of mapping the generic communication shared
> > memory region in the PCC mailbox driver when the PCC channel is requested,
> > we need to move pcc_mbox_ioremap() before pcc_mbox_request_channel().
> This patch is supposed to merge into patch 8/14 because it depend on this
> moving.

Not sure what exactly you mean. This is 7/14 and 8/14 depends on it which
falls in natural order. Or do you mean just merge the patch into one. I
can do that as well, just kept it separate to easy the review. Let me
know. I thought keeping it separate is good for bisectibility in case
I break anything with these change 😉.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ