[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8g01YhM_FtdB5n6@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 12:26:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Larry.Dewey@....com, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Make SEV_STATUS available via SYSFS
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 11:52:34AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> >
> > Current user-space tooling which needs access to the SEV_STATUS MSR is
> > using the MSR module. The use of this module poses a security risk in
> > any trusted execution environment and is generally discouraged.
> >
> > Instead, provide an file in SYSFS in the already existing
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/sev/ directory to provide the value of the
> > SEV_STATUS MSR to user-space.
>
> Right, to continue this discussion on the ML, like we said yesterday, I think
> that dumping a raw MSR value is not really user-friendly.
>
> We could stick a
>
> Coco:
>
> line in /proc/cpuinfo and simply dump SEV_STATUS there and TDX can put the
> respective TDX-specific feature flags of what is enabled there and then we
> have a good tested and well-known interface to communicate such things to
> userspace through.
>
> I'd say...
It's *far* better to expose this via a targeted sysfs entry than
polluting /proc/cpuinfo with it that everyone and their dog is parsing
all the time ...
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists